Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2/BiVO4 Layered Films under Visible Light Irradiation

Article information

J. Korean Ceram. Soc.. 2016;53(6):665-669
Publication date (electronic) : 2016 November 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.4191/kcers.2016.53.6.665
*Anhui Key Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei Anhui 230022, P. R. China
**Key Laboratory of Functional Molecule Design and Interface Process, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei Anhui 230601, P. R. China
***Department of Advanced Materials Science & Engineering, Hanseo University, Seosan 31962, Korea
Corresponding author : Feng-Jun Zhang, E-mail : zhang-fengjun@hotmail.com, Tel : +86-551-6382-8262, Fax : +86-551-6382-8106
Corresponding author : Won-Chun Oh, E-mail : wc_oh@hanseo.ac.kr, Tel : +82-41-660-1337, Fax : +82-41-688-3352
Received 2016 May 01; Revised 2016 August 06; Accepted 2016 October 07.

Abstract

TiO2/BiVO4 layered films were prepared by sol-gel and spin coating methods. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Uv-vis spectroscopy were used to investigate the crystal structure, morphology and ultraviolet-visible absorption of the TiO2/BiVO4 films. The photocatalytic activity of the prepared films was inspected according to the degradation of methylene blue. The results show that the prepared films present a net chain structure; the absorption band edge had obvious red shift. The degradation of the methylene blue solution was about 80% after 300 mins using TiO2/BiVO4 layered films under visible light, which was stronger than when using only pure TiO2 film and BiVO4 film.

1. Introduction

Since the 20th century, the rapid development of human society, the humanities and science have had fruitful results, but subsequent problems related to resources and ecology have seen all countries scrambling to try to solve such problems. Solar energy, as a non-polluting and renewable source of energy, should not be ignored or wasted. Therefore, the priority is how to effect the efficient utilization and conversion of solar energy.1)

Since Honda-Fujishima2) discovered the phenomenon in which a TiO2 semiconductor electrode performs catalytic decomposition of water, photocatalytic technology has attracted the attention of researchers, and this technology has provided us with an ideal method of energy utilization and control of environmental pollution. Photocatalytic technology is an advanced technology3) in which a catalyst uses photon energy to make many reactions that normally take place in harsh conditions respond in a mild environment. At present, the TiO2 based photocatalyst has the advantages of energy saving, no pollution, low price and high efficiency for the degradation of organic pollutants, which has become a hot research field.4) However, TiO2, because of its band gap of 3.2 eV, can be induced to react only by ultraviolet irradiation, 5) and ultraviolet content in the solar spectrum is only around 3%, which limits practical applications in dealing with environmental problems.6) Therefore, the key is doping modification of a nanometer TiO2 catalyst to improve the degree of visible light response, so as to improve the utilization rate of solar energy. Wang7) reported the amphipathic of TiO2 thin film in Nature in 1997, which article opened up a new direction in practical applications. The water contact angle of new preparation of TiO2 thin film is about 15°, while the water contact angle can be infinitely close to 0° under ultraviolet light irradiation, which indicates super hydrophilicity.8)

Since Kudo reported the properties of BiVO4 for water splitting under visible light for the first time, study in the field of photocatalysis has received wide attention.9) The compound BiVO4 has three crystal types: monoclinic (s-m), tetragonal (s-t) phase, and a zirconia structure with a tetragonal (z-t) phase.10) Studies have shown that the forbidden band width of monoclinic scheelite is about 2.4 eV, which is the section that includes most of the visible light response and the strongest photocatalytic activity. However, the photocatalytic ability of pure BiVO4 is not strong because of the weak adsorption ability and because the composite easily produces electrons and holes.11) Studies have shown that a composite of TiO2 powders and BiVO4 powder can effectively improve the photocatalytic ability.1214)

Studies and reports of single TiO2 thin films and BiVO4 films haveh been numerous, but composites of two kinds of thin film have not yet been reported. We prepared TiO2/BiVO4 layered film used the sol-gel process. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Uv-Vis spectroscopy were used to investigate the film crystal structure, morphology and ultraviolet-visible absorption ability. At the same time, the photocatalytic activity of the film was inspected through the degradation of methylene blue.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Preparation of TiO2 thin film

Butyl titanate (13 ml) was dissolved in anhydrous ethanol (12 ml) and diethanolamine (5 ml); then, the mixed solution was stirred for 1h at room temperature. Next, we added deionized water (1.7 ml), anhydrous ethanol (34 ml) and HCl (0.13 ml) to the above solution and stirred it for 15 min to form a clear yellow liquid. After this, the liquid was aged for 24 hours and a sol formed. TiO2 thin films were prepared by spin coating method (speed 3000 r/min, rotated for 30 s) using the sol. The wet films were pre-annealed at 100°C for 2 min and we then repeated the above procedures to get different thicknesses of TiO2 thin film. Finally, the films were annealed at 600°C for 1h in the air (the heating rate was 2°C/min).

2.2. Preparation of BiVO4 thin film

0.01 mol Bi (NO3)3·5H2O and 0.01 mol NH4VO3 were added to 0.01 mol citric acid and 30 ml 23.3% HNO3 solution; mixture was stirred evenly, and 7.5 ml acetic acid and 0.2 g PVP K30 were dissolved in the above solution; after this, the solution was stirred for 5h, and a blue sol formed. Citric acid and acetic acid were the chelating agent; PVP K30 was the film-promoter. BiVO4 thin films were prepared by spin coating method (speed of 3000 r/min, rotated for 30 s) using the sol. The wet films were pre-annealed at 180°C for 2 min and we then repeated the above procedures to get different thicknesses of the BiVO4 thin film. Finally, the films were annealed at 400°C for 5h in air (the heating rate was 4°C/min).

2.3. Preparation of TiO2/BiVO4 thin film

BiVO4 sol, which was made using the same preparation methods as those detailed in 2.2, was coated on the TiO2 thin film prepared used the methods in 2.1, which included using the spin coating method (3000 r/min, rotate 30 s). The wet films were pre-annealed at 180°C for 2 min and we then repeated the above procedures to get different thicknesses of the TiO2/BiVO4 thin film. Finally, the films were annealed at 400°C for 5h in air (the heating rate was 4°C/min).

2.4 Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained with a Bruker (Germany) D8 Advance (Cu radiation, tube voltage 40 kV, tube current 40 mA,0.22° step size,0.4 s/step scanning speed, scanning range of 10°–70°) device. SEM images were obtained with a JEOL JSM-7500F. We used the Shanghai UV-8000S series of ultraviolet spectrophotometer to measure the ultraviolet-visible absorption (scanning wavelength range is 200–800 nm). Methylene blue was degraded with a CEL-HXF300 xenon lamp light source.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phase analysis of the sample

Figure 1 shows the XRD of the TiO2 powders and the TiO2 thin film. It can be seen that (101), (004) and (200) peaks of the TiO2 powders were found at 25.44°, 38.1° and 48.02°, respectively. The sample was pure anatase TiO2 with high purity. The (101) peak of the TiO2 thin film was found at 25.44°, which showed that the TiO2 thin film was anatase; another characteristic peak was overshadowed by the characteristic peak of the glass substrate.

Fig. 1

XRD patterns of TiO2 powder and TiO2 thin film.

Figure 2 shows the XRD of the BiVO4 powder and the BiVO4 thin film. BiVO4 powder was bright yellow at pH = 4; BiVO4 powder was khaki. The XRD images of the powders with different pH and BiVO4 thin films are shown in Fig. 4.1. T represents the tetragonal(s-t) phases; M represents the monoclinic phase. In contrast with the PDF CARDS, it can be found that the BiVO4 powder had tetragonal(s-t) phases at pH = 7, while BiVO4 was in monoclinic phase at pH = 4. The color and crystal shape matching were consistent with those in the literature. T (200) and M (051) peaks were found in the XRD of the BiVO4 thin film; this image shows that the BiVO4 thin film was a mixture of monoclinic phase and tetragonal(s-t) phases.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of BiVO4 powder and BiVO4 film under different conditions.

Figure 3 shows the XRD of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film. The (101) characteristic peak of TiO2 was found at 25°, and the (040) characteristic peak of monoclinic phase BiVO4 was found at 30.6; this shows that the thin film contained anatase TiO2 and monoclinic phase BiVO4, while other characteristic peaks were concealed by the peaks of the glass substrates.

Fig. 3

XRD pattern of TiO2/BiVO4 thin film.

3.2. Morphology analysis of the sample

Figure 4 shows the SEM results for the TiO2 thin film, in which the coating number was 11 (hereinafter referred to as the T-11 film). These results show that the T-11 film was uniform, with no cracking phenomenon. The size of the particles was about 40 nm; a few impurities were found on the surface. Fig. 5 shows the SEM results for the BiVO4 powder under different levels of pH. Fig. 5(a) shows the SEM results of the BiVO4 powder at pH=4; it can be seen that the BiVO4 powder was spherical, had uniform dispersion, had no reunion phenomenon and that the size of the particles was about 1–2 um. Fig. 5(b) provides the SEM results of the BiVO4 powder at pH = 7; it shows that the BiVO4 powder had a flowered layering; its thickness was about 0.1–0.5 um. Fig. 6 shows the SEM results of the BiVO4 thin film, in which the coating number was 3 (this is hereinafter referred to as the B-3 film). It can be seen that the B-3 film presented a network chain structure, which was uniform and showed no reunions. The width of the single chain was about 0.1 um; the length was about 1 um. Fig. 7 shows the SEM results of the TiO2/BiVO4 film with different levels of magnification. It can be seen from Fig. 7(a) that the dark part at the bottom was TiO2 thin film, the bright part was BiVO4 thin film, the top film was relatively uniform and there was a certain degree of fracturing. It can be seen from Fig. 7(b) that the BiVO4 film presented network chains; however, the fracture phenomenon was obvious. The width of the single chain was about 100 nm.

Fig. 4

SEM of T-11 film.

Fig. 5

SEM of BiVO4 powder under different pH.

Fig. 6

SEM of B-3film with different magnifications.

Fig. 7

SEM of TiO2/BiVO4 film with different magnifications.

3.3. Uv-Vis spectral analysis

Figure 8 shows the Uv-Vis absorption spectrum of the TiO2 thin films with different coating numbers. The present experimental results show that the light absorption of the T-11 film was stronger under 550 nm illumination, according to the Scherer equation λ= 1240/Eg (λ was the limiting wavelength, Eg was the band gap energy); the band gap energy was 2.33 eV, which is far less than the value of 3.2 eV from the literature for pure TiO2. The redshift degree was larger. The T-11 film was transparent; it has good light transmittance. The present experimental results show that the red shift becomes broader with increasing of the number of layers, while the increase of the number of layers is not good for the preparation of TiO2 thin films. We will further study the law of absorbance of a maximum level of light by increasing the number of layers. Diethanolamine as a surfactant to improve the uniformity of the film was beneficial to reduce the occurrence of reunions; it also improved the film transmittance and the specific surface area.

Fig. 8

Uv-Vis absorption spectra of TiO2 thin film with different coating numbers.

Figure 9 shows the Uv-Vis absorption spectra of the BiVO4 thin film with different incoating numbers. It can be seen that the BiVO4 film had a very strong absorption at 400–500 nm. The edge of the absorption band was at around 570 nm, according to the Scherer equation λ= 1240/Eg (λ was the limiting wavelength, Eg was the band gap energy); the band gap energy was 2.17 eV, which shows that the material had catalytic activity under visible light. The light absorption of the BiVO4 thin film coating was measured 3 and 4 times for all wavelengths and was found to be stronger than that of the BiVO4 thin film coating for the 1, 2 and TiO2 thin films. Moreover, the increase of the number of layers is still not good for the preparation of BiVO4 thin films.

Fig. 9

Uv-Vis absorption spectra of BiVO4 thin film with different coating numbers.

Figure 10 provides a comparison chart for the Uv-Vis absorption spectra of B-3, the T-11 film and the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film. It shows that all films have strong absorption in the UV region. In the visible region, the strongest absorption was found for the BiVO4 film; the TiO2/BiVO4 layered films follow this and had values that were stronger than those of the T-11 film. The absorption band edge of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film showed redshift phenomenon, perhaps due to the Bi doped into the TiO2 lattice. On the other hand, the absorption to visible light of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film was weaker than that of pure BiVO4, which may also be attributed to the presence of TiO2 thin film, which reduces the absorption of visible light by the composite film.

Fig. 10

Uv-Vis absorption spectra of T-11 thin film, B-3 thin film and TiO2/BiVO4 thin film.

3.4. Degradation of methylene blue

Figure 11 provides a comparison chart for B-3, the T-11 film and the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film degraded by methylene blue under visible light irradiation. The ability to degrade methylene blue solution of TiO2/BiVO4 in a visible layered film was stronger than that of the pure B-3 film or the T-11 film. The rate of degradation of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film reached about 80% after 300 min, while that of the B-3 film was about 30% and that of the T-11 film was about 60%. When the time reached 420 min, the rate of degradation of the B-3 film was 40%; that of the T-11 film was about 80%. As is well known, the Eg potential is possibly a defect that can favor facile charge transfer. Therefore, the photocatalytic activity of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film cannot be higher than that of pure BiVO4. However, by controlling the components, certain layers of TiO2/BiVO4 can show higher photocatalytic activity than that of TiO2 or BiVO4 alone. Therefore, the catalytic activity under visible light of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film was much stronger than that of the single B-3 film or that of the T-11 film.

Fig. 11

Degradation curve of MB using B-3?T-11 and TiO2/BiVO4 thin films under 550 nm irradiation.

4. Conclusions

A TiO2/BiVO4 layered film containing anatase TiO2 and monoclinic phase BiVO4 was prepared. The BiVO4 film presented network chains, but a fracture phenomenon was obvious and the width of a single chain was about 100 nm. The absorption of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film in the visible light region was weaker than that of the BiVO4 film and better than that of the TiO2 thin film. The ability to degrade methylene blue solution of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film under visible light was stronger than that of the pure B-3 film or that of the T-11 film. The rate of degradation of the TiO2/BiVO4 layered film reached about 80% after 300 min, while the B-3 film showed a value of about 30% and the T-11 film showed a value of about 60%.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Education (KJ2015A026), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1408085MB33), the Science and Technology project of Anhui Province (1604a0802113), the Innovation Team Building Project of the Anhui University Research Platform (2016–2018) and the College Students’ Science and Technology Innovation Foundation (2016).

References

1. Evana P, Pemble ME, Sheel DW. Precursor-Directed Control of Crystalline Type in Atmospheric Pressure CVD Growth of TiO2 on Stainless Steel. Chem Mater 18:5750–55. 2006;
2. Fujishima A. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 238:37–8. 1972;
3. Gao YF, Nagai M, Seo WS. Template-Freeself-Assembly of a Nanoporous TiO2 Thin Film. J Am Ceram Soc 90(3):831. 2007;
4. Sidheswaran M, Tavlarides LL. Visible Light photocatalytic Oxidation of Toluene Using a Cerium-Doped Titania Catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:3346–57. 2008;
5. Khan MA, Han DH, Yang OB. Enhanced Photoresponse towards Visible Light in Ru- doped Titania Nanotube. Appl Surf Sci 255:3687–90. 2009;
6. Stengl V, Bakardjieva S, Murafa N. Preparation and Photocatalytic Activity of Rare Earth Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys 114(1):217–26. 2009;
7. Wang R. Light-Induced Amphiphilic Surfaces. Nature 388:431–32. 1997;
8. Jun S, Xie ZY, Wu XX. Sol-Gel Derived SiO2 Antireflective (AR) Coating Used in Solar Cells. Rare Met Mater Eng 37(2):47–50. 2008;
9. Kudo A, Ueda K, Kato H. Photocatalytic O2 Evolution under Visible Light Irradiation on BiVO4 in Aqueous AgNO3 Solution. Catal Lett 53:229–30. 1998;
10. Zhang L, Chen D, Jiao X. Monoclinic Structured BiVO4 Nanosheets: Hydrothennal Preparation, Formation Mechanism, and Coloristic and Photocatalytic Properties. J Phys Chem B 110(6):2668–73. 2006;
11. Akihiko K, Keiko O, Hideki K. A Novel Aqueous Process for Preparation of Cyrsatl Fomr-Controlled and Highly Cyrsatlline BiVO4 Powder from Layered Vanadates at Room Temperature and Its Photocatalytic and Photophysical Properties. Am Chem Soc 121(11):459–67. 1999;
12. Li G. Synthesis and Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2/BiVO4 Photocatalyst by Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Method. Appl Chem Ind 41(2):259. 2012;
13. Lei H. Preparation of BiVO4/TiO2 Composite Photo-Catalyst and the Photocatalytic Degradation of Sodium Humate. J Mol Catal 27(4):377. 2013;
14. Zhang SY. Study on Preparation and Photocatalytic Properties of Mica-Loaded TiO2/BiVO4 Composite Photocatalyst. New Chem Mater 40(10):21. 2012;

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

XRD patterns of TiO2 powder and TiO2 thin film.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of BiVO4 powder and BiVO4 film under different conditions.

Fig. 3

XRD pattern of TiO2/BiVO4 thin film.

Fig. 4

SEM of T-11 film.

Fig. 5

SEM of BiVO4 powder under different pH.

Fig. 6

SEM of B-3film with different magnifications.

Fig. 7

SEM of TiO2/BiVO4 film with different magnifications.

Fig. 8

Uv-Vis absorption spectra of TiO2 thin film with different coating numbers.

Fig. 9

Uv-Vis absorption spectra of BiVO4 thin film with different coating numbers.

Fig. 10

Uv-Vis absorption spectra of T-11 thin film, B-3 thin film and TiO2/BiVO4 thin film.

Fig. 11

Degradation curve of MB using B-3?T-11 and TiO2/BiVO4 thin films under 550 nm irradiation.