| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Login | Contact Us
J. Korean Ceram. Soc. > Volume 55(1); 2018 > Article
Balamurugan, Song, and Kim: Enhancing Gas Response Characteristics of Mixed Metal Oxide Gas Sensors


Semiconducting nanomaterials have attracted considerable interest in recent years due to their high sensitivity, selectivity, and fast response time. In addition, for portable applications, they have low power consumption, lightweight, simple in operation, a low maintenance cost. Furthermore, it is easy to manufacture microelectronic sensor structures with metallic oxide sensitive thin layers. The use of semiconducting metal oxides to develop highly sensitive chemiresistive sensing systems remains an important scientific challenge in the field of gas sensing. According to the sensing mechanisms of gas sensors, the overall sensor conductance is determined by surface reactions and the charge transfer processes between the adsorbed species and the sensing material. The primary goal of the present study is to explore the possibility of using semiconducting mixed metal oxide nanostructure as a potential sensor material for selective gases.

1. Introduction

The control of contaminated air sources is a current severe environmental problem, where recent significant global industrialization and modern human activities have led to the presence of an increased concentration of a wide range of toxic gases and organic pollutants in air and environment. The air pollutants can be divided into four significant categories (i) gaseous pollutants (e.g. CO, NOx) and volatile organic compounds; (ii) persistent organic pollutants (e.g. dioxins), (iii) heavy metals such as Pb and Hg and (iv) particulate matter. Among these pollutants, many toxicological and epidemiological studies established adverse health effects of toxic gases in the air. Human exposed to high concentration of toxic air can deaden the sense of smells.1) Health effect also has often found in human longer exposed to the low-level concentration. Depending on the ppm level, the detected gas could cause hypesthesia, headache or even it blocks the transfer of oxygen to the blood cell in the human systems.2) The control of contamination in the air environment also becomes increasingly important because it leads to the depletion of ozone layer, global warming, and climate change. Therefore, the earlier detection and monitoring of these toxic gases and degradation of organic pollutants from the air and environment has received intense research.
A sensor is a device that receives a physical, chemical or biological signal and converts it into an electric signal that is compatible with electronic circuits. Another term with a meaning similar to a sensor is the transducer. Sometimes transducer is used as a synonym for a sensor. A sensor may be composed by a series of transducers responding in the end with an electrical output, in which case, given the above definition, the last transducer in the series could also be termed a sensor. Gas sensors will be defined as “a device which provides an electrical output in response to the change in partial pressure of a gas”. In addition to the conductivity change of gas-sensing material, the detection of sensing reaction can be performed by measuring the changes in capacitance, work function, mass, optical characteristics or reaction energy released by the gas/solid interaction.
In order to improve environmental safety, there is a great interest and need to implementing sensing devices in carrying out the optimization of combustion reactions in the emerging transport industry, domestic as well as industrial and biological applications. For example, H2S gas is widely used in several industrial activities, and it is produced as a common by-product of more than 70 manufacturing processes.3) It is also typically released during the decay of the natural wastes. Besides, human bodies also produced the small amount of H2S and acted as a signalling molecule. For example, H2S is physiologically produced by cystathionine-β-lyase (CSE) and cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS), which is predominant, associated with the brain and vascular smooth muscle cells in the human body.4) Therefore, monitoring and detection of low-level H2S concentration devices is a crucial important requirement in various fields. The CO2 sensors are examples of devices that have found multiple uses; they are needed for indoor air quality operations as well as for incubators in food storage and processing. The low-temperature sensing of CO plays an important role in solving the growing environmental problems stemming from CO emission from automobiles, and industrial processes, etc.5) The application of SMO sensors for alcohol detection on the breath is an efficient way to aid police in apprehending drink driving offenders.6) Ammonia (NH3) is one of the most commonly used substances in many chemical process industries, refrigeration systems and fertilizer factories, etc. Nevertheless, human exposure to higher concentrations, it can cause burns on the skin, eyes, throat, or lungs causing permanent blindness and lung disease.7) In addition, ammonia aerosols have a severe environmental pollution such as acid rain and photochemical smog. In order to control such emissions, it is necessary to develop rugged and reliable NO gas sensing devices that can be put on the various emitting sites are required. The hydrogen sensors are needed in the rocket propulsion industry as hydrogen propellant leaks pose significant safety risks. In addition, the automotive industry routinely monitors the air to fuel ratio in vehicles with oxygen sensors. The automotive industry also has interest in NOx sensors because nitrogen oxide (nitrogen mono oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) together referred to as NOx) is a typical air pollutant, which causes environmental problems and arises principally from when fuel burns at high temperatures.8) They can travel great distances from their emission source and result in ozone, smog, and particulate matter far from the actual source of pollution. In spite of many efforts are currently made to reduce NOx emission either by the optimization and control of the combustion reaction or by the modern ultra-lean burn engine system under newly developed NOx storage catalyst conditions. However, this new engine system requires a reliable high-performance NOx sensor to be installed at the points before and after the NOx storage catalyst in order to improve its efficiency.9) Hydrocarbons are also a precursor to ground level ozone, and some types of hydrocarbons are known to be toxic and widely used as a common fuel for industrial and domestic purposes is potentially hazardous because of its explosive nature on account of leakage. Hence, it is necessary to develop suitable sensors for the detection of hydrocarbon. Therefore, detection of low-level toxic gas concentration is a crucial imperative requirement in various fields, such as industrial areas, the human body, and biological environment.
This increased demand has resulted in the accelerated development of new sensing materials and sensor technologies over the last decade.10,11) Developing gas sensors for harsh industrial environments is quite challenging because the sensors must be both highly sensitive and selective; i.e., in the presence of multiple oxidizing and reducing gases.5) To determine these endogenous gases in the environment, spectroscopic, chromatography and their combination systems have worked most effectively. However, the operation of this system is a more complicated process, as it involves a multi-step protocol starting from sampling to the final determination.12) Furthermore, the high cost sophisticated spectroscopic and analytical chromatography systems hinder the monitoring and detection of the gases in various site. As an alternative to the advanced tool, the chemiresistive metal oxide based semiconductors have been widely investigated for gas sensing applications. Therefore, gas sensing properties of mixed metal oxide nanostructures assembled by nanoparticles are reviewed in this work. The attention will be focused on the possibility of using semiconducting mixed metal oxide nanopowder as a potential selective sensor material for various gases.13)

2. Oxide Materials for Gas Sensor

2.1. Semiconductor metal oxide based gas sensor

Semiconductor metal oxide (SMO) based gas sensor devices play an important role in human health and environment safety. Over the years, extensive research and fabrication efforts have been carried out for the development of a single metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor.14) Among the SMOs used for gas sensors, Nb2O5, ZnO, CuO, NiO, and SnO2 have been widely studied as the best gas sensing materials to detect reducing gases (such as H2, CO, hydrocarbon, and alcohol) as well as oxidizing gases (such as oxygen and NOx).6) The sensitivity of gas sensors is directly proportional to the surface-area-to-volume ratio of the exposed sensing surface.5) The principle of operation of these metal-oxide based gas sensor relies upon the change in electrical conductivity due to the interaction between the gases in the environment and oxygen in the grain boundaries.

2.2. n and p-type semiconductor based gas sensor

From the material point of view, sensor materials are classified as n-type or p-type, depending on whether they show an increase or decrease in electrical resistance when they are exposed to reducing or oxidizing test gases. (Referring as example to an n-type semiconductor oxide).15) The resistance of the sensing layer with an n-type behavior decreases when the surface is exposed to electron-donating gases, such as CO or hydrocarbons. On the other hand, the resistance increases in the presence of electron-withdrawing gases such as NO2, even to values exceeding the detection limits of conventional circuitry.16) This resistance variation can be easily observed and used to detect chemical species in the ambient.5) The most of n-type sensor materials such as SnO2, ZnO, In2O3, Fe2O3 and WO3 have been extensively used as an excellent catalyst to promote selective oxidation of various volatile organic compounds. In contrast, the gas sensor fabricated using p-type oxide semiconductors such as NiO, CuO, Co3O4, Cr2O3 and Mn3O4 to date have received relatively little attention, and the related research to fabricate such gas sensor is still in the early stage of development.17) However, this sensor suffers from disadvantages owing to its selectivity for specific gases in a harsh environment and operating temperature. A selective sensor must be able to distinguish among the different gases or respond to only one of the gases in the mixture.5,18) In short, low detection limit and fast response and recovery of the gas sensor materials should be further improved for successful operation. An additional temperature change could be caused by catalytic reactions, occurring at the metal oxide surface during interaction with gas.19) Various studies have been performed to reduce the sensor operating temperature, including the doping of noble metals as a catalyst to reduce the operating temperature and improve the sensor life.20) In order to improve the gas selectivity of the metal oxide, intense research efforts have been devoted to pursuing new material that may be exploited for achieving high gas response characteristics of sensor devices. Recently, the latter has been improved by co-synthesis with other oxides, leading to thermally stable and highly sensitive nanoparticle layers. For some analytes, the selectivity is improved by the formation of specific crystal planes and phases that significantly facilitate the reliable detection of certain gases. Therefore, the alternative oxide structure is attracting significant research attention owing to its importance in practical applications.3)

2.3. Mixed metal oxide gas sensor

In recent years, mixed metal oxides nanostructures have received much attention for various technological applications in science and technology,21) since their functional metal oxidation states are crucial for determining the electronic, magnetic, and redox properties. The synthesis of suitably mixed metal oxides to carry out complex functions is one of the most important topics in the research field of sensors, catalysis, batteries, capacitors etc.22,23) In these potential applications, the mixed metal oxide should exhibit features such as a suitable combination of a polyfunctional metal catalyst with textural properties (crystallinity, porosity, morphology, and defects structure).24) It has been reported that various binary and ternary mixed metal oxide nanostructured systems exhibit a selective higher response to specific gases at low operating temperatures as compared to single metal oxide materials.25) Accordingly, perovskitetype (ABO3) metal oxides, such as rare earth with one or more transition metals have been considered as suitable candidates for the selective detection of specific gases under a harsh environment and as a promising alternative to high-cost noble metals.26)

3. ABO3 Rare-Earth Perovskite Gas Sensor

Rare-earth perovskite semiconductors denoted as ABO3 (A = rare earth), where A stands for a lanthanide or an alkaline earth element and B represents a transition metal. These compounds are highly relevant chemical and physical properties for technological applications such as a gas sensor, electrodes for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC), catalysts, among others.5,27,28) In this structure, the A cation is a large rare earth, alkali, and alkaline earth cation, which fits into the dodecahedral interstices, and the B cation is a catalytically active 3d or 4d transition metal ion, which is 6-fold coordinated with the oxygen anions. The stability of the mixed oxidation states (B3+-B2+) and unusual oxidation states of the perovskite offers significantly favored catalytic reactions. Its electrical property is related to the intrinsic oxygen deficiency, have been considered as suitable candidates for the selective detection of specific gases under a harsh environment and as a promising alternative to highcost noble metals. However, the synthesis conditions strongly influenced the structural characteristics as well as the catalytic activity of the ABO3 samples. Furthermore, the garnet phase (A3B5O12) is more thermodynamically stable than the ABO3. Since past decades, several investigation groups have used number of preparative methods to obtain garnet-free perovskite-type materials.5,29) Moreover, perovskite materials are generally synthesized via a solid-state method. Nevertheless, other chemical routes have been explored such as an aqueous solution method, sol-gel route, sol-precipitation process and glycine nitrate (G/N) plus EDTA route. These synthesis routes allowed obtaining products with homogeneity, high porosity and specific morphologies all of which to a great relevance due to its potential applications.15)

3.1. GdInO3 perovskite gas sensor

Among the perovskite semiconductors, GdInO3 belong to the ABO3 structure have evoked a lot of interest in recent years due to their promising properties, such as high conductivity and catalytic activity. Suitable substitution can control both these features at Gd and In sites of GdInO3.30) It has been found that ferroelectricity on these compounds is the interplay of bending of the BO5 trigonal bipyramid and the different A-O bond lengths along the c-axis. Moreover, GdInO3 is a vital prototype material that has hexagonal P63cm crystallography. GdInO3 have been extensively investigated as an alternative solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrode materials owing to their unique structural-dependent oxygen conductivity5,31) and it also exhibits good oxidation and reduction properties over a wide range of temperatures, and can be used in several potential applications such as gas separators, sensor, catalysis, etc. These potential applications of the GdInO3 materials depend mainly on the extent of structure, morphology, and controlled particle size. On the basis of gas sensing mechanism, redox reaction involves at the surface leading to a change in the depletion layer of the grains which in turn changes the electrical resistance of the sensor. The overall sensor conductance is determined by the surface reactions and the charge transfer processes between the adsorbed species and the semiconductor surface. Adsorption being a surface effect, surface area plays an important role in the sensing mechanism. Therefore, hierarchically nanostructured porous materials are promising candidates because their special structures are caused by particles of very small dimensions in comparison with the corresponding bulk counterparts. Because, nanosized materials large fraction of atoms is present at the surface and these atoms are greatly facilitated gas diffusion and mass transport on the sensor surface and enhance the gas sensing properties of semiconducting oxides. Besides high temperature solid-state preparation, perovskite nanocrystalline materials have been prepared using various simple solution-based chemical methods. Specifically, the hydrothermal approach has been considered as the most successful method to synthesize numerous versatile morphological nanostructures owing to its low reaction temperature and better control of physicochemical properties of nanostructured materials compared to other synthesis techniques. Therefore, we synthesized mesoporous hexagonal GdInO3-based semiconductor perovskite metal-oxide nanostructure using a single-step hydrothermal method with gadolinium nitrate and indium nitrate as precursors. The gas response characteristic of the prepared nanostructure is investigated with various combustible gases such as CO, gasoline, C2H5OH, H2S, and NH3, at different operating temperatures. Fig. 1(a-d) shows the mesoporous crystalline GdInO3 nanostructure has been determined to be effective for the detection of CO at 150°C. In addition, the author also investigated the effects of interfering gases on the response properties of the mesoporous crystalline GdInO3 as shown in Fig. 2(e-g). The schematic of sensor element and setup used for the gas response studies is as shown in Fig. 2.

3.2. Reduced graphen oxide loaded GdInO3 perovskite semiconductors

In order to enhance the gas sensitivity and reduce the operating temperature of perovskite metal-oxide based sensor, many modifications are commonly used such as loading with suitable additives, anionic doping, coupling, sensitization, and making defect from the modified synthesis process, etc. For this reason, we prepared reduced graphen oxide loaded GdInO3 (rGO/GdInO3) nanocomposites by using a single-step hydrothermal method for Co gas sensing applications and the sensor was fabricated by coated nanocomposites on alumina subtract. The rGO/GdInO3 nanocomposites exhibited a significantly higher sensing response to CO than the bare GdInO3, and fast dynamic curves of response and recovery were obtained even at 90°C (Fig. 3), demonstrating that the rGO/GdInO3 composite based sensor can detect low concentration CO rapidly at low temperatures. The enhanced sensing performance is mainly attributed to the catalytic effect of rGO to the oxidation of CO and strong interaction between the rGO and GdInO3 materials. Moreover, the vacancies or small holes created in the thermally reduced GO provide more active sites for much stronger O2 and CO adsorption than on the surface of the pure GdInO3 materials.5)

3.3. YMnO3 perovskite semiconductor gas sensor

Recently, the research on perovskite-type oxides as possible gas sensors has been extensive, due to the high thermal stability, catalytic activity and semiconductor behavior of the oxides.32) For example, RMnO3 (R = Bi, Y, Gd-Lu) has been studied as sensing materials. Many perovskite-related oxides show large variations in oxygen non-stoichiometry and defect concentrations, and they, therefore, have rich redox chemistries with variable oxidation states of the metal cations at the B-sites in the ABO3 structure.33) Furthermore, some structural features of perovskite-type oxides make them interesting material for investigation in gas sensors, electrodes for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC), catalysts, and magnetic devices, among others.34) Importantly, the RMnO3 (R = yttrium and rare-earth materials) oxide forms in two structural phases. The hexagonal phase (space group P63cm, Z=6) forms with R=Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, or Y, which have a small ionic radius, and the orthorhombic phase (space group Pnma, Z=4) for R=La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, or Dy, which possesses a larger ionic radius. Orthohombic phase shows only ferromagnetic ordering while hexagonal phase shows both ferromagnetic and ferroelectric ordering. Recently, the hexagonal YMnO3 oxides are believed to be an excellent material, particularly for nonvolatile memory devices and MFS (Metal-Ferroelectrics-Semiconductor) devices because of their coupled magnetic and ferroelectric behavior.35) Such electromagnetic multiferroics which exhibit simultaneous ferroelectricity and magnetism can be exploited in both electrical and magnetic applications.5,36-39) Therefore, in our previous work, we have prepared hexagonal YMnO3 nanocrystalline powder via a novel citrate route. The hexagonal YMnO3 nanocrystalline powder shows excellent gas sensing characteristics towards 20 ppm H2S gas at an operating temperature 100°C as shown in Fig. 4(a). The selectivity of hexagonal YMnO3 nanopowder based sensor was investigated by different reducing gases as a function of operating temperature and the concentrations of test gases. The sensor was exhibited high selectivity towards 20 ppm H2S gas compared with those of the corresponding reducing gases CO, H2, and LPG as shown in Fig. 4(b). The better sensing properties exhibited by YMnO3 could be attributed to their nanostructure with high a surface area, which can provide high reaction between H2S gas and sensor material. Furthermore, the pores and nanostructure can act as a channel for the diffusion of gas and provide more active sites. Additionally, the presence of the higher order hexagonal phase can be an additional aspect responsible for high sensitivity of the YMnO3 material. Simultaneously, the YMnO3 system can produce more vacant oxygen, leading more oxygen species being absorbed on the surface of YMnO3, which eventually improves the oxidation of the exposed gas and getting shorter response time. Furthermore, manganese oxide can provide the basic surface for the YMnO3 sensor, allowing it to easily adsorb acidic H2S gas, which may be the reason for its maximum response to H2S with excellent selectivity. This system contains mixtures of metal oxide nanocrystals (Y+3Mn+3O3−6) that interact with each other and leads to a change in the electronic structure of the bulk nanocrystals and offer more advantage than single oxides for the sensitivity and selectivity detection of H2S gas.3)

4. AB2O6 and ABO4 Structured Materials for Gas Sensor

4.1. Cobalt niobates (CoNb2O6) gas sensor

The niobate or vanadium based AB2O6 compounds, (A=Ba, Sr, Mg and Zn, B=Nb and Ta) with either coulombite (orthorhombic) or trirutile (tetragonal) type structures show that they have excellent electrooptic, pyroelectric, magnetic, thermoelectric, piezoelectric, photo-refractive, and microwave dielectric applications.40-43) Recently, several combinations that can be accomplished through A and B yield a great variety of AB2O6 type composite oxides are promising sensing electrode alternatives due to their high thermal stability, excellent catalytic properties and ease of synthesis. It has been reported that the conventional ceramic route at high temperature is the common method of preparation of these compounds. Products obtained in this processes often have a wide particle size distribution and a wide particle size distribution. Nevertheless, other chemical routes have been explored, such as sol-gel method and wet-chemical method also require expensive niobates. Some reports of hydrothermal synthesis under mild conditions have been found, while most of the published studies were only concerned with the synthesis of alkali or alkaline-earthmetal-niobates (Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, etc.).44-46) Transition metal niobates, especially the cobalt niobates47) have attracted many scientists due to their fascinating and well-defined structure and intrinsic properties. The transition metal oxides depicting p-type nature and with dn (n varying between 1 and 9) configuration (i.e. oxides of Cr, Co, Fe, etc.) are easily susceptible to oxidation as well as reduction.48) Further, the high mobility of oxygen and stabilization of unusual oxidation states in their structure are believed to successfully employ for gas sensing application. However, some researchers have reported the magnetic properties of CoNb2O6, but a sensing application on this material has not been reported. The first time we reported synthesis and characterization of CoNb2O6 nanopowder and investigated their ethanol vapor sensing performance.6) The sensitivity of the CoNb2O6 based sensor was studied by measuring the resistance of the sensor in the air and the reducing gas environments such as C2H5OH, H2S, NH3, and LPG. Fig. 5(a) shows the SEM image of the prepared CoNb2O6 nanopowder. The gas response characteristics of Fig. 5(b-d) clearly show that this CoNb2O6 based sensor is higher response to ethanol gas at 130°C, the 120 ppm ethanol response increased sharply to reach 89% of its saturated level height within 10 s. The selectivity plot of CoNb2O6 at an optimum operating temperature at different concentrations of interfering gases clearly shows that this sensor is highly selective for ethanol gases. The 120 ppm ethanol response time was about 10 s and the recovery time was about 18s. Similarly, for other gases such as H2S, the response time and recovery were 14 and 25 s, respectively, for NH3 they were 13 and 15 s, respectively, and for LPG they were 10 and 10 s, respectively. From above the result, we concluded that the CoNb2O6 sensor might be a preferable candidate for detecting ethanol.

4.2. NH3 gas sensor based on vanadium-based material

Various sensing materials such as transition metal compounds and conducting polymers have been extensively studied for NH3 gas sensor applications, among which vanadium oxide based material results from a number of different interrelated electronic and structural factors. These compounds have partially filled d-orbitals which are responsible for a wide variety of electronic, magnetic and catalytic properties.49) The phase diagram shows that vanadium atoms exist in different formal oxidation states, which vary from two to five. The easy conversion between oxides of different stoichiometry and formation of oxygen vacancies enables the oxide to function as a catalyst for selective oxidation.50) For gas-sensing applications, a vanadium-based material is a promising choice due to its high catalytic application, environmentally benign nature and low cost.13) Therefore we reported first time mesoporous NiV2O6 nanopowder for an NH3 gas sensing application. Among the various synthesis methods, author prepared NiV2O6 nanopowder using a simple and reliable solution based method.
Figure 6(a-d) shows the prepared NiV2O6 nanopowder SEM and TEM images. Fig. 6(e-g) in reference13) indicated that the sensor sample based on NiV2O6 nanostructure produced by solution based method had higher response and shorter response time to 100 ppm ammonia at 120°C. This material can have bivalent catalytic centers by assuming that charge transport might occur via the Ni+-O-Ni2+ framework with all V ions in a +5 state or V4+-O-V5+ framework with all Ni ions in a +2 state. Moreover, higher sensing activity of NiV2O6 nanopowder may be attributed to the fact that besides the one component sites Ni1+-O-Ni2 + and V5+-OV4+, there will be also the mixed sites Ni1+-O-V5+ and/or Ni2+-O-V4+ ion pairs as a result of mutual charge interaction. Therefore, the presence of fraction of reduced V4+ ions in the system is capable to reduce Ni2+ major centres partly to ions of lower oxidation, whereas Ni1+ minor centres being more active species in NH3 sensing reaction. Here the presence of vanadium atom seems to stabilize the catalyst structure against oxidation as well as reduction and to permit a very strongly oxidized/reduced sensing material. This leads to easy recovery of the original state of the sensing material. This means that the observed changes of the electrical resistance are probably due to the changes of valence state of catalytically active components of the sensor material.13)

4.3. ABO4 structured materials for gas sensor

ABO4 compounds (A= transitions metal and B = Nb5+, Ta5+ or Sb5+) have received much attention owing to their unique properties such as ferroelectrics and anti-ferroelectrics with the stibiotantalite structure which consists of layer of vertex sharing, distorted BO6 octahedral parallel to the (001) plane of the orthorhombic unit cell. Moreover, they possess excellent piezoelectric, pyroelectric and electro-optic properties at room temperature.51) Very recently; our group reported a series of porous ABO4 structure-based nanoparticles that were synthesized for use in NH3, ethanol, and LPG gas sensing applications.

4.4. NH3 gas sensor based on ABO4 bismuth material

Among the various ABO4 compound, bismuth-based microwave dielectric ceramic has stimulated great research interest owing to its unique structural, electrical properties and promising applications in the field of multilayer capacitor.52-54) From the viewpoint of gas sensors, BiNbO4 could be considered as promising candidate for future developments of sensing materials. According to the sensing mechanisms of gas sensors, the overall sensor conductance is determined by surface reactions and the charge transfer processes between the adsorbed species and the sensing material.55) With the progress of gas sensing research, it has been found that porous structure with a high specific surface area and surface accessibility can significantly improve the gas sensing properties. Therefore, we reported the NH3 sensing behavior of the novel BiNbO4 nanopowder.7) The obtained BiNbO4 nanopowder SEM morphology is shown in Fig. 7(a). The sensing response of BiNbO4 based material was studied by varying its electrical resistance in the air and reducing gas environments. The BiNbO4 nanopowder-based sensor detects NH3 selectively over other interfering gases such as H2S, ethanol and LPG.
In order to obtain the optimum operating temperature (Topt) for NH3, the sensor response was analyzed over a temperature range of 50 - 350°C keeping the gas concentration constant. The Topt for NH3 sensing was found at the temperature of about 325°C. The chances of cross-sensitivity during NH3 sensing at (Topt) is clarified by obtaining Topt for the test gases such as hydrogen sulphide (H2S), ethanol (C2H5OH) and liquid petroleum gas (LPG). The Topt for H2S (54%), ethanol (46%) and LPG (40%) sensing is found to be 300, 250 and 225°C, respectively (Fig. 7(b)). The gas sensing response of BiNbO4 as a function of various concentrations of test gases at their Topt (NH3-325°C, H2S-305°C, ethanol-250°C, LPG-225°C) is shown in Fig. 7(c). The sensor response is remarkably high when exposed NH3 at its Topt compared the sensing response of other gases at their respective Topt. While the sensor response is low when exposed to comparable concentration of interfering gases such as H2S, ethanol and LPG, this indicates clearly a selective response of the sensor towards ammonia. This selective response was owing to the complete oxidization of NH3 on the sensor surface, thereby changing the conductivity of the sensor element drastically compared to other gases. The measured response for 20 ppm, 60 ppm, and 120 ppm NH3 gas is around 38%, 70% and 87%, respectively. It can be seen that NH3 gas attained maximum response within 16 s and their recovery time was less than 17 s (Fig. 7(d)). The fast response, as well as recovery of the above discussed sensor, can be attributed to the large surface area and high porosity of the prepared sensor material. The improved selectivity obtained with this BiNbO4 sensor makes it a valuable tool in the determination of NH3 gas.

4.5. LPG gas sensor based on LaNbO4 material

LaNbO4 is an excellent ceramic oxide having high thermal and mechanical stability. It exhibits polymorphism viz. monoclinic and tetragonal phases.56) LaNbO4 is used in solid oxide fuel cells, hydrogen sensors etc., because of its enhanced physical and chemical properties.57-59) In the field of gas-sensing materials, LaNbO4 could be considered as a potential candidate for future developments of sensing materials. Therefore, we reported the first time for LPG, NH3 and ethanol sensing properties of nanocrystalline LaNbO4 prepared by the solution-based method.60) The gas response characteristics of the LaNbO4 based sensor has been studied by measuring the resistance of the sensor material in air and then in a reducing gas environment. Fig. 8(a) and (b) show the schematic of sensor element and electrical circuit of the LaNbO4 gas response studies. (b) Fig. 9(a and b) shows the SEM and TEM morphology of prepared LaNbO4 nanocrystalline. Fig. 9(c) shows the gas sensitivity versus operating temperature for LaNbO4 based sensor for different test gases. At 250°C, the highest gas sensitivity for LPG was 80%, while other gases gave 59% for ammonia and 22% for ethanol gas at 250°C. When exposed to reducing gases like liquid petroleum gas (LPG) ammonia (NH3) and ethanol (C2H5OH) Compared to ammonia and ethanol, LaNbO4 showed the highest response for LPG at an operating temperature of 250°C. This may be attributed to the availability of sufficient adsorbed ionic species of oxygen on the sensor surface which reacts most efficiently with LPG molecules at this particular temperature. Beyond the optimum temperature, desorption of all oxygen ionic species occurs causing a decrease in sensitivity. The temperature plays an important role in the charge carrier concentration and the Debye length. This may be one of the reasons for the decrease in sensitivity of the LaNbO4 sensor at higher temperature. Fig. 9(d). depicts the response and recovery curves to 500 ppm LPG and NH3 gas of LaNbO4 sensor at an operating temperature 250°C. When LPG gas was introduced, the response time of sensor to reach the maximum response was less than 25 s and the recovery time to restore original value from the maximum response was less than 100 s. The response and recovery time for NH3 it was 10 s and 80 s, respectively. LaNbO4 based sensor has very promising future for LPG detection in the low ppm range with a response time in the seconds range.

4.6. Ethanol gas sensor based on InNbO4 material

InNbO4 based semiconductor materials have been attracted by many researchers due to its unique structural and important physical properties.61-63) This can also be used as a key precursor for the ferroelectric perovskite, lead indium niobate, Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3, for actuator, transducer and ultrasonic motor applications.64) Indium niobate based materials were prepared by solid-state reactions of In2O3 and Nb2O5 at high calcination temperatures. However, this preparation process had several disadvantages such as controlling the component homogeneity, crystal size, stoichiometric ratio, and formation of un-desirable phases. Therefore, we prepared monoclinic InNbO4 nanopowder using a low temperature niobium citrate complex process.65) This process yielded reactive powder with high purity, higher surface areas, fine particle size, high degree of crystallinity, and low temperature sinterability, compared to the powder prepared by conventional solid state reaction method. In addition, as the reactants are mixed in an aqueous solution, this method enabled to produce a good chemical homogeneity of the system. The gas sensing properties of the InNbO4 nanopowder had been studied for different gases such as liquid petroleum gas (LPG), ammonia (NH3) and ethanol (C2H5OH) at various operating temperatures. The response of InNbO4 nanopowder as a function of gas concentrations as well as with recovery time had also been studied. The InNbO4 sensor showed highest sensitivity for LPG (0.97) and NH3 (0.70) gas at 300°C and for ethanol (0.46) at 325°C as shown in Fig. 10(b). Fig. 10(c) revealed the sensor response of InNbO4 as a function of various concentrations of test gases at their optimal operating temperatures. The sensor response increased with increase in concentrations of test gases and attained almost a maximum response at 500 ppm for all three gases. Fig. 10(d) showed the sensor response with time for LPG, NH3 and ethanol gas at the optimum operating temperature of 300°C for LPG, NH3 and 325°C for ethanol, respectively. It can be seen that LPG gas attained maximum response within 14 second and it was 35 second for ethanol and 19 second for ethanol, respectively. However, their recovery times were less than 124 s, 114 s and 99 s, for LPG, NH3 and ethanol gases, respectively.

4.7. LPG gas sensor based on CrNbO4 material

CrNbO4 is one of the well known compounds of the ABO4 family which has recently gained considerable attention, because of its interesting physical and chemical properties such as polymorph, magnetic and electrochemical properties due to its ionic and electronic defects. In addition, the phase relationship and dielectric properties indicated that to possess sensing activity. In general, this compound is synthesized by the conventional ceramic route, in which appropriate amount of metal oxide are mixed, and then the mixture is heated for a long period at high temperatures. This preparation process has led to uncontrollable grain growth and non-stoichiometry problem due to volatilization of the constituent components at high temperature, which results in a decrease in the gas sensitivity of the obtained material to a great extent. Therefore, it is necessary to develop nanosized CrNbO4 for gas sensor applications. We reported the synthesis of CrNbO4 nanopowder by niobiumcitrate complex process.66) The TEM result in Fig. 11(a) showed the average particle size of CrNbO4 is 25 nm. The gas sensing properties of CrNbO4 nanopowder to three typical reducing gases were tested (Fig. 11(b) - (d)). The results indicated that the sensors had high responses to LPG and ethanol at 325°C and 300°C, respectively. The response time of LPG, ethanol and NH3 were about 9, 19, 35 s, respectively.

4.8. AlNbO4 material based gas sensor

Due to its enhanced sensitivity, the development of semiconductor metal oxide sensors is of continued interest. Niobium based binary metal oxides such as AlNbO4 is being studied extensively, exhibit interesting structural, chemical electrical and optical properties. Therefore, in the previous investigation, we report the synthesis of AlNbO4 nanopowder by niobium-citrate complex process.67) The gas response properties of prepared AlNbO4 nanopowder based sensor were studied by measuring the resistance of the sensor in air and in the reducing gas environment. SEM and TEM microstructure of AlNbO4 in Fig. 12(a-b) shows the porous nature of the surface and the average size of the rectangle shaped nanoparticles was 30 nm in width and 60 nm in length, respectively. The gas sensing properties of AlNbO4 based sensor was examined at the temperatures in the range of 50 - 350°C as shown in Fig. 12(c). AlNbO4 nanopowder had n-type behaviour and good response towards ethanol compared to the other two reducing gases (LPG and NH3) at an operating temperature of 250°C. This sensor is very promising for selective ethanol detection in the low ppm range, with a response time in second range as shown in Fig. 12(d).

4.9. FeNbO4 material based gas sensor

Semiconductor mixed metal oxide is one of the most interesting materials for gas sensing applications. In particular, mesoporous mixed oxide materials have been extensively investigated in the last two decades because of their uniform pore sizes, tuneable pore structures, ease of functionalization and large surface areas. Beyond the most-investigated silica and carbon based materials, metal oxides have attracted considerable interest due to their more diverse electronic functionality. Recently, FeNbO4 composite oxide was found to be more effective in terms of better sensitivity and selectivity to reducing gases. In addition, FeNbO4 semiconducting oxides have been studied extensively for a variety of applications. These include photo anode materials with potential applications in the conversion of solar energy and gas sensors. Moreover, they are well known as the key precursor for successful preparation of single phase perovskite Pb(Fe1/2Nb1/2)O3, which is important for multilayer ceramic capacitor applications. FeNbO4, as a functional ntype semiconductor, has stimulated great research interest due to its unique optical and electrical properties. It exhibits semiconducting and magnetic behavior owing to coexistence of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions. Most importantly, FeNbO4 structure has been established as a promising material for detecting gases.68,69) Therefore, we reported for the first time ethanol gas sensing phenomena observed in mesoporous nanocrystalline FeNbO4, prepared by the niobium-citrate complex process.70) Products obtained in this way are generally more homogenous, have higher surface area and finer particle size. Most importantly, it exhibits mesoporosity, higher degree of crystallinity and purity along with lower temperature sinterability than that of powders prepared by conventional methods. These properties enhance ethanol sensing of FeNbO4 prepared by niobium-citrate complex process. The SEM results (Fig. 13(a)) showed that the sample consists spherical particles with uniform grain size distribution. The sensitivity results (as shown in Fig. 13(b) - (d)) revealed that FeNbO4 had better response for C2H5OH at relatively lower operating temperature of 200°C. The response time of C2H5OH was less than 20 s. The high sensitivity and selectivity characteristic of FeNbO4 based sensor is related to the acid-base properties of the sensing surface. The presences of Fe atom enhance the basic sites in FeNbO4 surface and promote the sensitivity of the material to ethanol vapor in a very selective way. However, the rate of the surface reaction is in proportion to the number of available adsorption sites on the outer surface of the sensing material. Hence, high surface area, high surface atomic activity, smaller grain size, lower activation energy and mesoporous structure of the FeNbO4 can greatly enhance the number of the adsorption sites. Additionally, niobium oxides possess a vast reservoir of mobile lattice oxygen, which is capable of increasing active selective sites during gas adsorption and enchaining the response towards ethanol.

5. Metal Oxide Composites for Gas Sensor

Recently, accelerated developments in nanotechnology and the extension of new nanostructured material syntheses have been improving the performance and utilization of semiconductor materials in sensing applications. Beyond the most investigated functional nanomaterial, p-type nickel oxide (NiO) was found to possess gas sensing activity.71) However, to enhance gas sensitivity and selectivity, various additive based composites have been used. These additives could act as promoters, catalysts, surface sites for adsorption of oxygen and gases to be detected by promoting the improvement of porosity of the gas sensing matrix. Earlier works revealed that a few noble metals or transition metals (namely Pt, Ru, Fe, Mn, Ni, Al, Cr, Co, Bi, etc) additive based composites significantly affected both electrophysical and gas sensing characteristics of metal oxides. In particular, NiO always contains defects; it is thermodynamically stable only if it contains defects.72) The charge of the missing metal ions is compensated by holes on adjacent oxygen atoms. It has attracted considerable interest due to its wide range of practical applications, including dye-sensitized photocathodes, smart windows, super-capacitors, antimicrobial activity, catalysts and fuel cell electrodes.73) However, the sensor performance of NiO depends on the number of free electrons in the outermost shells, which is greatly influenced by the change in resistance of the sensor. NiO, having in this form the Ni2+ ion, has a 3d8 electronic configuration, and its triply degenerate state (t2g) is filled, with one free electron in a doubly degenerate (eg) state; these free electrons facilitate the electron transport mechanism. Therefore, NiO has been widely used as the material for many gases sensing reactions.74-78)

5.1. PdO-loaded NiO heteromixtures for gas sensing application

To improve the H2S sensing characteristics of the wide band gap (3.83 eV) semiconductor NiO, various modification methods have been commonly employed. Among the modification method, the formation of narrow (PdO 1.08 eV) and wider band gap (NiO 3.83 eV) heterojunctions could facilitate the electron-hole separation and enhance the interfacial charge transfer efficiency between donor and acceptor states, which help to improve the sensing characteristics. For this reason, we synthesized NiO and different wt.% PdO-loaded NiO heteromixtures for gas sensing application by using a simple metal-citrate complex technique.79) Gas sensing performances, the experimental results indicated that the 5 wt.% PdO- doped NiO nanopowder based sensor exhibited a high response and repeatability towards 100 ppm H2S (95%) at a relatively low temperature of 60°C. It also was found that the 5 wt.% PdO-doped NiO heteromixture based sensor was more selective and had a faster response to H2S than to other interfering gases.

5.2. La-loaded ZnO composites for gas sensing application

To meet the increasing demand for CO2-sensing materials, it is essential to develop new, inexpensive materials with a high CO2 response. Among the various CO2 sensing methods, semiconductor-based sensing systems are one of the most promising, compact, low-cost methods for CO2 detection. Semiconductor metal oxides, such as SnO2, ZnO, and CuO, are attractive candidates for the detection of different kinds of gases.80) Among the various semiconductor metal oxides, nanostructed (high surface/volume ratio), wide-band-gap (3.4 eV) ZnO has attracted significant attention because of its unique electronic, optical, and magnetic properties, which make it useful in a wide range of technological applications such as hydrogen storage,81) piezoelectric devices,82) batteries,83) and gas sensors.84) Moreover, in gas sensing, a metal oxide requires a catalyst to be deposited on the sensor surface to accelerate the reaction and increase the sensitivity In particular, La can act as the catalyst and modify the electrical properties of base materials and sensor characteristics. The performance of ZnO in response to CO2 is greatly improved by the addition of La.85) The better performance is due to the p-n junction between n-type (ZnO) and p-type (La2O3) materials. Moreover, La (117 pm) has a greater ionic radius than Zn (88 pm); hence, it can be loaded into the pure structure of ZnO to create large lattice distortion. Furthermore, metal oxides contain acid/base surface sites, which control the adsorption and desorption properties of the gas molecules.86-88) The basic surface sites of La can enhance the adsorption of acidic CO2, which may increase the response of La-loaded base materials. In this respect, D. H. Kim et al. reported the LaCl3 coated with commercially available tin oxide surface shows the highest sensitivity to CO2 gas by heat treating at 1000°C.89) Furthermore, A. Marsal et al. investigate CO2 sensing properties of La doped SnO2, and a significant response change can be obtained by La doped SnO2 rather than the undoped SnO2 sensor.90) Among the various synthesis methods, the hydrothermal approach has been widely adopted because it is a simple, high-yield, and more controllable process that offers higher surface areas and low-temperature sinterability of the synthesized material compared to powders prepared by the previously mentioned methods.
In previous research, pure ZnO and La-loaded ZnO gas sensor materials were synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method.15) SEM image of the pure ZnO and 50 at% Laloaded ZnO nanopowders revealed interesting morphological characteristics as shown in Fig. 14(a-f). The prepared materials were utilized as CO2 gas sensing analysis, and the results indicated that the pure ZnO nanopowder to 5000 ppm of CO2 was 11% at 400°C, as shown in Fig. 15(a). Fig. 15(b) and (c) clearly show that the CO2 response of 1 and 4 at% La-loaded ZnO were 14.7 and 20%, which are higher than the response of pure ZnO at the same operating temperature of 400°C. The results indicate that the dopant (La) effectively influenced the sensing properties of the ZnO material. The CO2 response of the ZnO was markedly increased (37%) for 10 at% La loaded ZnO based sensor at operating temperature of 400°C as shown in the Fig. 16(a). Furthermore, a systematic investigation of variation in sensor response as a function of gas concentration was carried out, as shown in in Fig. 16(b). To further enhance the CO2 response, we attempted to increase the La concentration, leading to a gradual enhancement of the CO2 response that reached a maximum response (65%) after loading around 50 at% La in ZnO at an operating temperature of 400°C, as shown in Fig. 16(c-d). The enhanced performance is attributed to the large lattice distortion and the concerted effect between the Zn and La-active materials is a key factor in improving the CO2 adsorption and reactivity on the surface. The proposed material is very promising for CO2 monitoring environment due to their high sensitivities and short response time.

5.3. Sensing mechanism for mixed metal oxides

Bimetallic systems are of great interest in the design of new materials with industrial applications in the areas of catalysis, electrochemistry and microelectronics. Suitably designed bimetallic catalysts utilize the beneficial effect of the interaction between the two metals for the enhancement of both catalytic activities.91) It is well-known that response properties and selectivity depend on the nature of active sites the in structure of the sensor surface. Both base and acid sites can contribute to the adjustment of sensor properties. Moreover, the surface acidity of metal oxides can play an important role the in selective sensing of gases. Mixed metal oxide surfaces are expected to exhibit modified chemical properties compared to pure metal surfaces. The response behavior of the selective sensing of gas could be correlated closely to the surface redox ability of mixed metal oxide catalysts.
The semiconductor gas sensing mechanism of mixed metal oxide is based on the reactions between the surface of the material and the interaction of gas molecules, which causes a change in the material resistance due to a charge transfer between the adsorbates and the adsorbent. Normally, the mobile lattice oxygen acts as the selective site in gas adsorption. The partially reduced metal ion (M+) to possess vast reservoir of oxygen generates highly mobile charge carriers. Jerzy Haber92) reported that at temperatures lower than 140°C, the catalysis surface is covered by reactive electrophilic O and O2−, whereas at temperatures higher than 140°C, only nucleophilic O2− species are present at the surface. The adsorption of O was the most interesting process in sensors, because these oxygen ions were more reactive and thus made the material more sensitive to the presence of reducing gases. When the sensor material was exposed to gases, the superficial reactions of with the oxygen species caused more electrons to return to the conduction band (depending on nature of gas; donor/acceptor of electrons); the electrons injected into the surface recombined with some of the holes, thus reducing the concentration of the charge carriers and increasing the resistance of the p-type sensor materials. Therefore, the improved ionosorption of oxygen species due to the spill over effect will promote the enhanced response of the sensor to the reducing gases.13)
Sensor materials are classified as n-type or p-type, depending on whether they show an increase or decrease in electrical conduction, when they are exposed to oxidizing or reducing test gas. Here, we briefly introduce to the sensing mechanism of p-type mixed metal oxides in NH3 is given based on the example of NiV2O6. The surface reactions between the oxygen and the sensor material can be described as follows:13)
The typical sensing mechanism of p-type semiconducting sensor is shown in Fig. 17. When the sensor surface are exposed to air, oxygen molecules will adsorb on the surface of sensor and form O ions by capturing electrons from the conduction band. This leads to the formation of a charge accumulation layer at the shell by the following reaction and as seen in the energy level diagram shown in Fig. 17(a).
The equivalent band diagram is represented as an upward band bending, see Fig. 17(a). When the sensor grains are exposed to the reducing gas (NH3) gas, the adsorbed O species interacts with the NH3, resulting in the release of captured electrons according to the following reaction.
The charge carrier accumulation layer near the surface is thinned by the electrochemical interaction between O (ads) and reducing gases, which in turn increases the sensor resistance. Upon exposure to a reducing gas, the density of p-type charge carriers (positive holes) would decrease due to the surface adsorption and chemical reaction between the gas and the oxygen adsorbates (electron acceptor), which is represented in terms of the lowering of upward band bending (Fig. 17(b)), which is the opposite to that seen with the n-type semiconductor gas sensors. Furthermore, NiV2O6 can have bivalent catalytic centers by assuming that charge transport might occur via the Ni+-O-Ni2+ framework with all V ions in a +5 state or V4+-O-V5+ framework with all Ni ions in a +2 state. Moreover, higher sensing activity of NiV2O6 nanopowder may be attributed to the fact that besides the one component sites Ni1+-O-Ni2 + and V5+-O-V4+, there will be also the mixed sites Ni1+-O-V5+ and/or Ni2+-O-V4+ ion pairs as a result of mutual charge interaction. The presence of fraction of reduced V4+ ions in the system is capable to reduce Ni2+ major centres partly to ions of lower oxidation, whereas Ni1+ minor centres being more active species in NH3 sensing reaction. Here the presence of vanadium atom seems to stabilize the catalyst structure against oxidation as well as reduction and to permit a very strongly oxidized/reduced sensing material. This leads to easy recovery of the original state of the sensing material. This means that the observed changes of the electrical resistance are probably due to the changes of valence state of catalytically active components of the sensor material. The role of the Nickel in enhancing the sensitivity and response rate of the sensor element could be due to the increase the acid sites, which catalyses the oxidation of NH3.13)

6. Conclusions

In summary, the gas sensing process is strongly related to the surface reactions. Different metal oxide based materials have different reaction activation to the target gases. Mixed metal oxides usually show better gas response than the single component if the catalytic actions of the mixed metal complement each other. Transitions metal or noble metal additives with high-effective oxidation catalytic activity can be used to enhance the sensitivity of pure metal oxides due to the “spillover effect”. Moreover, a good catalyst supporting materials are also a pivotal point to determine a selective response of various gases. So, the structure of metal oxide layers is very important. The sensing mechanism is based on the surface reaction of the particles with the exposed gas by adsorption and desorption mechanism. The adsorption being a surface effect, surface area plays an important role in the sensing mechanism. The High surface areas are necessary to obtain highly-dispersed catalyst particles. In the nanosized materials, a large fraction of the atoms are present at the surface, Therefore, nanostructure with porosity seems to be the standard structure of sensor materials and are enhance the gas-sensing properties of mixed metal oxides semiconductor.


This research was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the Encouragement Program for The Industry of Economic Cooperation Region (No. R0004802).

Fig. 1
Low and high SEM images of (a-d) the annealed GdInO3 nanopowder, (e) CO response of the GdInO3 as a function of operating temperature, (f) selectivity of the GdInO3 based gas sensors to different concentration of CO at optimum operating temperature (g) Response and recovery time of the GdInO3. Reprinted with permission from reference.5)
Fig. 2
Schematic of the experimental setup used for gas sensor evaluation. Reprinted with permission from reference.5)
Fig. 3
Low and high TEM images of (a-b) the annealed rGO/GdInO3 nanopowder, (e) CO response of the rGO/GdInO3 as a function of operating temperature, (f) selectivity of the GdInO3 based gas sensors to different concentration of CO at optimum operating temperature (g) Response and recovery time of the rGO/GdInO3. Reprinted with permission from reference.5)
Fig. 4
(a) Sensor response toward 500 ppm of reducing gases as a function of operating temperature. (b) Cross sensitivity of YMnO3 sensor element to the different gases at an operating temperature of 100°C. Reprinted with permission from reference.3)
Fig. 5
(a) SEM image of CoNb2O6 nanopowder calcined at 700°C. (b) The response of CoNb2O6 sensor as a function of various operating temperatures for C2H5OH, LPG, and NH3 gases. (c) selectivity of CoNb2O6 sensor as a function of ppm concentration at optimum operating temperatures for C2H5OH, H2S, LPG and NH3 gases (d) response of CoNb2O6 sensor as a function of time at optimum operating temperatures. Reprinted with permission from reference.6)
Fig. 6
(a) SEM image of NiV2O6 nanopowder, (b-d) HR-TEM image of rod-like NiV2O6 nanostructures (e) response of a sensor to reducing gases as a function of operating temperature, (f) response of the sensor to different concentrations of NH3, ethanol, H2S, and LPG at 120°C, (g) response and recovery time of the sensor to 100 ppm NH3 at 120°C. Reprinted with permission from reference.13)
Fig. 7
(a) FE-SEM images of BiNbO4, (b) dynamic gas sensing characteristics of BiNbO4 nanopowder towards NH3, H2S, ethanol, and LPG as a function of operating temperatures, (c) gas sensing response of BiNbO4 as a function of concentrations (20 - 140 ppm) and (d) response and recovery time of the sensor to different concentrations of NH3. Reprinted with permission from reference.7)
Fig. 8
(a) The schematic of sensor element used for the gas response studies (b) electrical circuit of the gas response test system (Vh: heating voltage, Vc: circuit voltage, Vc: output signal voltage and RL: load resistance). Reprinted with permission from reference.60)
Fig. 9
(a-b) SEM and TEM image of the LaNbO4 nanopowder calcined at 900°C (c) variation in gas response for LPG, NH3 and ethanol gas as a function of gas concentrations at 250°C (d) response and recovery of LaNbO4 sensor as a function of time at their optimum operating temperatures for LPG and NH3 gases. Reprinted with permission from reference.60)
Fig. 10
(a) TEM image of InNbO4 obtained at 600°C. (b) gas sensing characteristics of InNbO4 sensor as a function of various operating temperatures for LPG, NH3 and C2H5OH gases. (c) sensitivity of InNbO4 sensor with the different concentrations of LPG, NH3 and C2H5OH at their optimum operating temperatures. (d) response of InNbO4 sensor as a function of time at their optimum operating temperatures for LPG, NH3 and C2H5OH gases. Reprinted with permission from reference.65)
Fig. 11
(a) TEM micrograph of CrNbO4 powder obtained at 800°C. (b) response of CrNbO4 sensor in LPG, ethanol and NH3 gases as a function of operating temperatures. (c) response of CrNbO4 sensor with different concentrations of LPG, ethanol and NH3 at their optimum operating temperature. (d) response of CrNbO4 sensor as a function of time at their optimum operating temperatures for LPG, ethanol and NH3 gases. Reprinted with permission from reference.66)
Fig. 12
(a), (b) SEM and TEM micrograph of AlNbO4 nanopowder obtained at 900°C. (c) The esponse of AlNbO4 sensor with the different concentrations of C2H5OH, LPG and NH3 at their optimum operating temperatures. (d) response of AlNbO4 sensor as a function of time at their optimum operating temperatures for C2H5OH, LPG and NH3 gases. Reprinted with permission from reference.67)
Fig. 13
(a) SEM micrograph of FeNbO4 nanopowder powder obtained at 800°C (b) gas sensing characteristics of FeNbO4 sensor for ethanol, NH3 and LPG as a function of various operating temperatures. (c) Sensor response with different concentrations of ethanol, NH3 and LPG at their optimum operating temperatures. (d) Ethanol, NH3 and LPG gas response of FeNbO4 sensor at their optimum operating temperatures. Reprinted with permission from reference.70)
Fig. 14
(a) The relative resistance changes of the sensors exposed to 100 ppm concentration of H2S gas as a function of operating temperature (b) response of 5% PdO-doped NiO sensor with various interfering gases at 60°C. Reprinted with permission from reference.79)
Fig. 15
(a) Shows low-magnification SEM images of the pure ZnO nanopowder calcined at 500°C. The inset in left-side SEM of (a) shows enlarged spherical particles of ZnO nanopowder, (b) SEM image showing the magnified view of the dense ZnO nanorods (c - e) shows the low and high-magnification SEM image of 50% La-loaded ZnO nanopowder calcined at 500°C, and (f) corresponding EDX mapping spectra. Reprinted with permission from reference.15)
Fig. 16
(a) The response of pure ZnO nanopowder based sensor with 5000 ppm CO2 concentration at 400°C, (b) 1 at% La-loaded ZnO based sensor and (c) 4 at% La-loaded ZnO based sensor. Reprinted with permission from reference.15)
Fig. 17
Schematic showing (a) interaction between oxygen and sensor grain and corresponding energy band diagram; (b) interaction between NH3 and sensor grain and corresponding energy band diagram.


1. MF. Struve, JN. Brisbois, R. ArdenJames, MW. Marshall, and DC. Dorman, “Neurotoxicological Effects Associated with Short-Term Exposure of Sprague-Dawley Rats to Hydrogen Sulfide,” Neurotoxicology, 22 [3] 375-85 (2001).
2. YG. Yu, DK. Ning, and LG. Qian, “The First-Principle Calculation of H2S Adsorption and Decomposition on the ZnO (0001) Surface,” Chin J Struct Chem, 29 1139-46 (2010).

3. C. Balamurugan, and DW. Lee, “Perovskite Hexagonal YMnO3 Nanopowder as p-type Semiconductor Gas Sensor for H2S Detection,” Sens Actuators, B, 221 857-66 (2015).
4. Y. Zhang, ZH. Tang, Z. Ren, SL. Qu, MH. Liu, LS. Liu, and ZS. Jiang, “Hydrogen Sulfide, the Next Potent Preventive and Therapeutic Agent in Aging and Age-Associated Diseases,” Mol Cell Biol, 33 [6] 1104-13 (2013).
5. C. Balamurugan, S. Arunkumar, and D-W. Lee, “Hierarchical 3D Nanostructure of GdInO3 and Reduced-Graphene-Decorated GdInO3 Nanocomposite for CO Sensing Applications,” Sens Actuators, B, 234 155-66 (2016).
6. C. Balamurugan, AR. Maheswari, and D-W. Lee, “Structural, Optical, and Selective Ethanol Sensing Properties of p-type Semiconducting CoNb2O6 Nanopowder,” Sens Actuators, B, 205 [15] 289-97 (2014).
7. C. Balamurugan, DW. Lee, AR. Maheswari, and M. Parmar, “Porous Wide Band Gap BiNbO4 Ceramic Nanopowder Synthesised by Low Temperature Solution-Based Method for Gas Sensing Applications,” RSC Adv, 4 54625-30 (2014).
8. F. Menil, V. Coillard, and C. Lucat, “Critical Review of Nitrogen Monoxide Sensors for Exhaust Gases of Lean Burn Engines,” Sens Actuators, B, 67 [1-2] 1-23 (2000).
9. S. Zhuiykov, and N. Miura, “Development of Zirconia-Based Potentiometric NOx Sensors for Automotive and Energy Industries in the Early 21st. Century: What are the Prospects for Sensors?,” Sens Actuators, B, 121 [2] 639-51 (2007).
10. AR. Phani, S. Manorams, and VJ. Rao, “Preparation, Characterization and Electrical Properties of SnO2 Based Liquid Petroleum Gas Sensor,” Mater Chem Phys, 58 [2] 101-8 (1999).
11. YD. Wang, XH. Wu, and ZL. Zhou, “Novel High Sensitivity and Selectivity Semiconductor Gas Sensor Based on the p+n Combined Structure,” Solid-State Electron, 44 [9] 1603-7 (2000).
12. SK. Pandey, KH. Kim, and KT. Tang, “A Review of Sensor-Based Methods for Monitoring Hydrogen Sulfide,” Trends Anal Chem, 32 87-99 (2012).
13. C. Balamurugan, and DW. Lee, “A Selective NH3 Gas Sensor Based on Mesoporous p-type NiV2O6 Semiconducting Nanorods Synthesized Using Solution Method,” Sens Actuators, B, 192 414-22 (2014).
14. TH. Kim, JW. Yoon, and JH. Lee, “Avolatile Organic Compound Sensor Using Porous Co3O4 Spheres,” J Korean Ceram Soc, 53 [2] 134-38 (2016).
crossref pdf
15. Y-J. Jeong, C. Balamurugan, and D-W. Lee, “Enhanced CO2 Gas-Sensing Performance of ZnO Nanopowder by La Loaded during Simple Hydrothermal Method,” Sens Actuators, B, 229 288-96 (2016).
16. ZU. Abideen, J-H. Kim, JH. Lee, JY. Kim, A. Mirzaei, HW. Kim, and SS. Kim, “Electrspun Metal Oxide Composite Nanofibers Gas Sensors: A Review,” J Korean Ceram Soc, 54 [5] 366-79 (2017).
crossref pdf
17. Z. Hao, . Qi, M. Chuai, B. Xiao, T. Yang, Y. Luo, and M. Zhang, “Synthesis of Dandelion-Like NiO Hierarchical Structures Assembled with Dendritic Units and their Performances for Ethanol Gas Sensing,” New J Chem, 39 7873-78 (2015).
18. N. Savage, B. Chwieroth, A. Ginwalla, BR. Patton, SA. Akbar, and PK. Dutta, “Composite n-p Semiconducting Titanium Oxides as Gas Sensors,” Sens Actuators, B, 79 [1] 17-27 (2001).
19. G. Korotcenkov, “Practical Aspects in Design of One-Electrode Semiconductor Gas Sensors: Status Report,” Sens Actuators, B, 121 [2] 664-78 (2007).
20. AR. Phani, SV. Manorama, and VJ. Rao, “X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Studies on Pd Doped SnO2 Liquid Petroleum Gas Sensor,” Appl Phys Lett, 71 [16] 2358-60 (1997).
21. C. Moure, and O. Pena, “Recent Advances in Perovskites: Processing and Properties,” Prog Solid State Chem, 43 [4] 123-48 (2015).
22. J. Malowney, N. Mestres, X. Borrise, A. Calleja, R. Guzman, J. Llobet, J. Arbiol, T. Puig, X. Obradors, and J. Bausells, “Functional Oxide Nanostructures Written by EBL on Insulating Single Crystal Substrates,” Microelectron Eng, 110 94-9 (2013).
23. MA. Peña, and JLG. Fierro, “Chemical Structures and Performance of Perovskite Oxides,” Chem Rev, 101 [7] 1981-2018 (2001).
24. S. Mathur, H. Shen, N. Lecerf, A. Kjekshus, H. Fjellvag, and GF. Goya, “Nanocrystalline Orthoferrite GdFeO3 from a Novel Heterobimetallic Precursor,” Adv Mater, 14 [19] 1405-9 (2002).
25. S. Palimar, SD. Kaushik, V. Siruguri, D. Swain, AE. Viegas, C. Narayana, and NG. Sundaram, “Investigation of Ca Substitution on the Gas Sensing Potential of LaFeO3 Nanoparticles towards Low Concentration SO2 Gas,” Dalton Trans, 45 13547-55 (2016).
26. X. Li, C. Tang, M. Ai, L. Dong, and Z. Xu, “Controllable Synthesis of Pure-Phase Rare-Earth Orthoferrites Hollow Spheres with a Porous Shell and their Catalytic Performance for the CO + NO Reaction,” Chem Mater, 22 4879-89 (2010).
27. VV. Kharton, AA. Yaremchenko, AV. Kovalevsky, AP. Viskup, EN. Naumovich, and PF. Kerko, “Perovskite-Type Oxides for High-Temperature Oxygen Separation Membranes,” J Membr Sci, 163 [2] 307-17 (1999).
28. E. Traversa, S. Matsushima, G. Okada, Y. Sadaoka, Y. Sakai, and W. Watanabe, “NO2 Sensitive LaFeO3 Thin Films Prepared by r.f. Sputtering,” Sens Actuators, B, 25 [1-3] 661-64 (1995).
29. V. Bedekar, OD. Jayakumar, J. Manjanna, and AK. Tyagi, “Synthesis and Magnetic Studies of Nano-Crystalline GdFeO3 ,” Mater Lett, 62 [23] 793-95 (2008).
30. R. Shukla, V. Grover, SK. Deshpande, D. Jain, and AK. Tyagi, “Synthesis and Structural and Electrical Investigations of a Hexagonal Y1-xGdxInO3 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.0) System Obtained via Metastable C-Type Intermediates,” Inorg Chem, 52 [22] 13179-87 (2013).
31. DH. Kuo, and KC. Huang, “Phase Composition and Properties of Solid Solutions of GdFeO3-GdInO3 Bulks,” Ceram Int, 34 [6] 1503-7 (2008).
32. LG. Ortiz, JR. Gómez, JMF. Álvarez, HG. Bonilla, ML. Olvera, VMR. Betancourtt, YV. Gómez, AG. Cervantes, and JS. Salazar, “Synthesis, Characterization and Sensitivity Tests of Perovskite-Type LaFeO3 Nanoparticles in CO and Propane Atmospheres,” Ceram Int, 42 [16] 18821-27 (2016).
33. T. Tabari, and H. Tavakkoli, “Fabrication and Characterization of Perovskite-Type Oxide LaFe0.9Co0.1O3 Nanoparticles and Its Performance in Aerobic Oxidation of Thiols to Disulfide,” Chin J Catal, 33 [11] 1791-96 (2012).
34. J. Zhu, and A. Thomas, “Perovskite-Type Mixed Oxides as Catalytic Material for NO Removal,” Appl Catal, B, 92 [3-4] 225-33 (2009).
35. BBV. Aken, TTM. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and NA. Spaldin, “The Origin of Ferroelectricity in Magnetoelectric YMnO3 ,” Nat Mater, 3 164-70 (2004).
36. J. Park, J-G. Park, GS. Jeon, HY. Choi, C. Lee, W. Jo, R. Bewley, KA. McEwen, and TG. Perring, “Magnetic Ordering and Spin-Liquid State of YMnO3 ,” Phys Rev B, 68 104426-6 (2003).
37. Y. Aikawa, T. Katsufuji, T. Arima, and K. Kato, “Effect of Mn Trimerization on the Magnetic and Dielectric Properties of Hexagonal YMnO3 ,” Phys Rev B, 71 184418-22 (2005).
38. M. Zaghrioui, V. Ta Phuoc, RA. Souza, and M. Gervais, “Polarized Reflectivity and Lattice Dynamics Calculation of Multiferroic YMnO3 ,” Phys Rev B, 78 184305-12 (2008).
39. DP. Kozlenko, SE. Kichanov, S. Lee, JG. Park, VP. Glazkov, and BN. Savenko, “High-Pressure Effect on the Crystal and Magnetic Structures of the Frustrated Anti-ferromagnet YMnO3 ,” JETP Lett, 82 [4] 193-97 (2005).
40. N. Natarajan, V. Samuel, R. Pasricha, and V. Ravi, “A Coprecipitation Technique to Prepare BaNb2O6 ,” Mater Sci Eng B, 117 [2] 169-71 (2005).
41. R. Pasricha, and V. Ravi, “Preparation of Nanocrystalline MgNb2O6 by Citrate Gel Method,” Mater Lett, 59 2146-48 (2005).
42. V. Ravi, “A Coprecipitation Technique to Prepare SrNb2O6 ,” Mater Charact, 55 [1] 92-5 (2005).
43. VV. Deshpande, MM. Patil, SC. Navale, and V. Ravi, “A Coprecipitation Technique to Prepare ZnNb2O6 Powders,” Bull Mater Sci, 28 [3] 205-7 (2005).
44. Y. Zhang, C. Liu, G. Pang, S. Jiao, S. Zhu, D. Wang, D. Liang, and S. Feng, “Hydrothermal Synthesis of a CaNb2O6 Hierarchical Micro/Nanostructure and Its Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity,” Eur J Inorg Chem, 2010 [8] 1275-82 (2010).
45. FE. Osterloh, “Inorganic Materials as Catalysts for Photochemical Splitting of Water,” Chem Mater, 20 [1] 35-54 (2007).
46. SN. Akihiko Kudo, and H. Kato, “Overall Water Splitting into H2 and O2 under UV Irradiation on NiO-loaded ZnNb2O6 Photocatalysts Consisting of d10 and d0 Ions,” Chem Lett, 28 1197-98 (1999).
47. RC. Pullar, “The Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Columbite Niobates (M2+Nb2O6): A Critical Review,” J Am Ceram Soc, 92 [3] 563-77 (2009).
48. VE. Henrich, and PA. Cox, The Surface Science of Metal Oxides; pp. 159-61 Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994.

49. JR. Istas, R. de Borger, L. de Temmerman, . Guns, K. Meeus-Verdinne, A. Ronse, P. Scokart, and M. Termonia, “Effect of Ammonia on the Acidification of the Environment,”; in European Communities Rept No EUR 11857 EN, 1988.

50. SV. Krupa, “Effects of Atmospheric Ammonia (NH3) on Terrestrial Vegetation: A Review,” Environ Pollut, 124 [2] 179-21 (2003).
51. YC. Liou, WC. Tsai, and HM. Chen, “Low-Temperature Synthesis of BiNbO4 Ceramics Using Reaction-Sintering Process,” Ceram Int, 35 [6] 2119-22 (2009).
52. D. Liu, Y. Liu, SQ. Huang, and X. Yao, “Phase Structure and Dielectric Properties of Bi2O3-ZnO-Nb2O5-based Dielectric Ceramics,” J Am Chem Soc, 76 [8] 2129-32 (1993).

53. HC. Ling, MF. Yan, and WW. Rhodes, “High Dielectric Constant and Small Temperature Coefficient Bismuth-Based Dielectric Compositions,” J Mater Res, 5 [8] 1752-62 (1990).
54. ES. Kim, and W. Choi, “Effect of Phase Transition on the Microwave Dielectric Properties of BiNbO4 ,” J Eur Ceram Soc, 26 [10-11] 1761-66 (2006).
55. B. Timmer, and OW. Berg, “Ammonia Sensors and their Applications-A Review,” Sens Actuators, B, 107 [2] 666-77 (2005).
56. T. Mokkelbost, HL. Lein, PE. Vullum, R. Holmestad, T. Grande, and M-A. Einarsrud, “Thermal and Mechanical Properties of LaNbO4-Based Ceramics,” Ceram Int, 35 [7] 2877-83 (2009).
57. YJ. Hsiao, TH. Fang, YS. Chang, YH. Chang, CH. Liu, LW. Ji, and WY. Jywe, “Structure and Luminescent Properties of LaNbO4 Synthesized by Sol-Gel Process,” J Lumin, 126 [2] 866-70 (2007).
58. R. Haugsrud, and T. Norby, “Proton Conduction in Rare Earth Ortho-Niobates and Orthotantalates,” Nat Mater, 5 193-96 (2006).
59. R. Hauigsrud, and T. Norby, “High-Temperature Proton Conductivity in Acceptor-Doped LaNbO4 ,” Solid State Ionics, 177 [13-14] 1129-35 (2006).
60. C. Balamurugan, D-W. Lee, and A. Subramani, “Preparation and LPG-Gas Sensing Characteristics of p-type Semiconducting LaNbO4 Ceramic Material,” Appl Surf Sci, 283 58-64 (2013).
61. Z. Zou, J. Ye, and H. Arakawa, “Photophysical and Photocatalytic Properties of InMO4 (M = Nb5+, Ta5+) under Visible Light Irradiation,” Mater Res Bull, 36 [7-8] 1185-93 (2001).
62. AL. Petre, JA. Perdigon-Melon, A. Gervasini, and A. Auroux, “Characterization and Reactivity of Group III Oxides Supported on Niobium Oxide,” Catal Today, 78 [1-4] 377-86 (2003).
63. Z. Zou, J. Ye, and H. Arakawa, “Structural Properties of InNbO4 and InTaO4: Correlation with Photocatalytic and Photophysical Properties,” Chem Phys Lett, 332 [3-4] 271-77 (2000).
64. Z. Zou, J. Ye, K. Sayama, and H. Arakawa, “Direct Splitting of Water under Visible Light Irradiation with an Oxide Semiconductor Photocatalyst,” Nature, 414 625-27 (2001).
crossref pdf
65. C. Balamurugan, E. Vijayakumar, and A. Subramania, “Synthesis and Characterization of InNbO4 Nanopowder for Gas Sensors,” Talanta, 88 115-20 (2012).
66. C. Balamurugan, G. Bhuvanalogini, and A. Subramania, “Development of Nanocrystalline CrNbO4 Based p-type Semiconducting Gas Sensor for LPG, Ethanol and Ammonia,” Sens Actuators, B, 168 165-71 (2012).
67. C. Balamurugana, A. Subashinia, GN. Chaudharib, and A. Subramania, “Development of Wide Band Gap Sensor Based on AlNbO4 Nanopowder for Ethanol,” J Alloys Compd, 526 110-15 (2012).
68. DH. Dawson, and DE. Williams, “Gas-Sensitive Resistors: Surface Interaction of Chlorine with Semiconducting Oxides,” J Mater Chem, 6 409-14 (1996).
69. V. Dusastre, and DE. Williams, “Gas-Sensitive Resistor Properties of the Solid Solution Series Ti x (Sn1-y Sb y )1-x O2 (0 < x < 1, y=0, 0.01, 0.05),” J Mater Chem, 6 445-50 (1999).
70. C. Balamurugan, DW. Lee, and A. Subramania, “Selective Ethanol Gas Sensing Behavior of Mesoporous n-type Semiconducting FeNbO4 Nanopowder Obtained by Niobium-Citrate Process,” Curr Appl Phys, 14 [3] 439-46 (2014).
71. T. Yu, X. Cheng, X. Zhang, L. Sui, Y. Xu, S. Gao, H. Zhao, and L. Huo, “Highly Sensitive H2S Detection Sensor at Low Temperature Based on Hierarchically Structured NiO Porous Nanowall Arrays,” J Mater Chem A, 3 11991-99 (2015).
72. B. Fromme, d-d-Excitations in Transition-Metal Oxides: A Spin Polarized Electron Energy Loss (SPEELS) Spectroscopy Studies; Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 2001.

73. N. Ajoudanian, and AN. Jhieh, “Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Nickel Oxide Supported on Clinoptilolite Nanoparticles for the Photodegradation of Aqueous Cephalexin,” Mater Sci Semicond Process, 36 162-69 (2015).
74. C. Cantalini, M. Post, D. Buso, M. Guglielmi, and A. Martucci, “Gas Sensing Properties of Nanocrystalline NiO and Co3O4 in Porous Silica Sol-Gel Films,” Sens Actuators, B, 108 [1-2] 184-92 (2005).
75. JA. Dirksen, K. Duval, and TA. Ring, “NiO Thin-Film Formaldehyde Gas Sensor,” Sens Actuators, B, 80 [2] 106-15 (2001).
76. N. Miura, J. Wang, M. Nakatou, P. Elumalai, S. Zhuiykov, and M. Hasei, “High Temperature Operating Characteristics of Mixed-Potential-Type NO2 Sensor Based on Stabilized-Zirconia Tube and NiO Sensing Electrode,” Sens Actuators, B, 114 [2] 903-9 (2006).
77. CY. Lee, CM. Chiang, YH. Wang, and RM. Ma, “A Self-Heating Gas Sensor with Integrated NiO Thin-Film for Formaldehyde Detection,” Sens Actuators, B, 122 [2] 503-10 (2007).
78. C. Luyo, R. Ionescu, LF. Reyes, and Z. Topalian, “Gas Sensing Response of NiO Nanoparticles Films Made by Reactive Gas Deposition,” Sens Actuators, B, 138 [1] 14-20 (2009).
79. C. Balamurugan, YJ. Jeong, and DW. Lee, “Enhanced H2S Sensing Performance of a p-type Semiconducting PdO-NiO Nanoscale Heteromixture,” Appl Surf Sci, 420 638-50 (2017).
80. VD. Kapse, SA. Ghosh, GN. Chaudhari, FC. Raghuwanshi, and DD. Gulwade, “H2S Sensing Properties of La-Doped Nanocrystalline In2O3 ,” Vacuum, 83 [2] 346-52 (2009).
81. S. Cho, J. Ma, Y. Kim, Y. Sun, G. Wong, and J. Ketterson, “Photoluminescence and Ultraviolet Lasing of Polycrystalline ZnO Thin Films Prepared by the Oxidation of the Metallic Zn,” Appl Phys Lett, 75 2761(1999).
82. T. Yamamoto, T. Shiosaki, and A. Kawabata, “Characterization of ZnO Piezoelectric Films Prepared by rf Planarmagnetron Sputtering,” J Appl Phys, 51 3113-20 (1980).
83. K. Keis, E. Magnusson, H. Lindstorm, SE. Lindquist, and A. Hagfeldt, “A 5% Efficient Photoelectrochemical Solar Cell Based on Nanostructured ZnO Electrodes,” Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 73 [1] 51-8 (2002).
84. H. Xu, X. Liu, D. Cui, M. Li, and M. Jiang, “A Novel Method for Improving the Performance of ZnO Gas Sensors,” Sens Actuators, B, 114 [1] 301-7 (2006).
85. NV. Hieu, ND. Khonang, DD. Trung, LD. Toan, and NV. Duy, “Comparative Study on CO2 and CO Sensing Performance of LaOCl-Coated ZnO Nanowires,” J Hazard Mater, 244 209-16 (2013).
86. G. Centi, G. Golonelli, and G. Busca, “Modification of the Surface Pathways in Alkane Oxidation by Selective Doping of Broensted Acid Sites of Vanadyl Pyrophosphate,” J Phys Chem, 94 [17] 6813-19 (1990).
87. P. Conception, A. Galli, JM. Lopez Nieto, A. Dejoz, and MI. Vazquez, “On the Influence of the Acid-Base Character of Catalysts on the Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Alkanes,” Top Catal, 3 [3-4] 451-60 (1996).
88. JC. Vedrine, JMM. Millet, and J-C. Volta, “Molecular Description of Active Sites in Oxidation Reactions: Acid-Base and Redox Properties, and Role of Water,” Catal Today, 32 [1-4] 115-23 (1996).
89. DH. Kim, JY. Yoon, HC. Park, and KH. Kim, “CO2 Sensing Characteristics of SnO2 Thick Film by Coating Lanthanum Oxide,” Sens Actuators, B, 62 [1] 61-6 (2000).
90. A. Marsal, A. Cornet, and JR. Morante, “Study of the CO and Humidity Interference in La Doped Tin Oxide CO2 Gas Sensor,” Sens Actuators, B, 94 [3] 324-29 (2003).
91. C-Y. Kim, JW. Elam, PC. Stair, and MJ. Bedzyk, “Effects of Off-Stoichiometry of LiC6 on the Lithium Diffusion Mechanism and Diffusivity by First Principles Calculations,” J Phys Chem C, 114 2375-79 (2010).
92. S. Zafeiratos, FE. Paloukis, MM. Jaksic, and SG. Neophytides, “Thermal Stability of Electrodeposited Nickel on Vanadium: Evidence for Oxygen Diffusion and Intermetallic Phase Formation,” Surf Sci, 552 [1-3] 215-28 (2004).
Editorial Office
Meorijae Bldg., Suite # 403, 76, Bangbae-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06704, Korea
TEL: +82-2-584-0185   FAX: +82-2-586-4582   E-mail: ceramic@kcers.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Ceramic Society. All rights reserved.                      developed in m2community